Young lives bullied to death 73
Recent child suicides illustrate anti-bullying initiatives
are not working for everyone
![]()
By
Moira MacDonald ,Toronto Sun
First posted: Saturday, November 12, 2011 07:17 PM EST

A man
stops to read a display outside a downtown Ottawa store — articles and messages
about Jamie Hubley, 15. The Ottawa teen and bullying
victim took his own life last month. CHRIS ROUSSAKIS/QMI AGENCY
Mitchell Wilson, 11. Jamie Hubley,
15. Chris Howell, 17.
Three
boys, all living in Ontario, all dead within six weeks of each other, each by
his own hand.
Each was a kid dealing with
difference.
Mitchell had muscular dystrophy.
Chris had Tourette’s syndrome, obsessive-compulsive
disorder and ADHD. Jamie was gay.
All three were bullied.
This isn’t a whodunit, or even a whatdunit.
As one researcher expressed it to
me, when it comes to youth suicide, it’s hard to pinpoint exactly what led to
the child’s fatal decision.
In these cases was it bullying? Discrimination? Was it mental illness? All three boys
suffered degrees of mental distress.
No wonder.
Maybe it was some combination of all
of the above.
But that shouldn’t stop us from
looking at the factors we know about and asking what’s being done.
As far as bullying goes, there’s gobs of money thrown at it, but these cases strongly
suggest it’s not working — not for everyone.
Mitchell Wilson had his face smashed
into the pavement. His alleged attacker was arrested and removed from his
school — but that boy’s friends continued to harass Mitchell.
Chris Howell was taunted by other
kids since grade school because of how he looked and acted.
Jamie Hubley
had batteries stuffed down his throat in Grade 7, and his posters promoting a
“Rainbow Club” at his high school ripped down.
The supposed educational
counter-measures to bullying didn’t work for them.
So as we enter Bullying Awareness
Week the question that has to be constantly asked is, “yes — but does it work?”
There is no point bringing in
another new anti-bullying program or sitting teachers in front of videos if
there’s no proof — or no one is even looking for it — that such things actually
cut down bullying and make things better for those who are targets.
Lip-service isn’t enough either. If
I had a dollar for every time I heard someone in the school system say, “we
take bullying very seriously” I’d have a nice rainy day fund.
Ditto for the times the targets of
bullying have attested they were told they could change schools — not their
bullies — if they didn’t feel safe.
If the targets of bullying aren’t
treated seriously when they’re alive, how can those in charge keep saying they
take bullying seriously? It’s insulting.
Likewise, I’ve been contacted plenty
of times by well-meaning people about the latest bullying awareness program or
presentation.
I can’t recall anyone giving me data
showing these things worked.
The Toronto District School Board
recently had a proposal to spend $100,000 on an entertainer who does bullying
prevention shows for students.
Apparently he’s very engaging and
kids love him. Yes, but does it work?
We’re told by researchers that
bullying in Canada is high.
But we don’t know how much bullying
is going on in Ontario schools. Data is kept on the number of bullying-related
suspensions — but not all bullies get suspended.
Why not keep data on the number of
bullying complaints at school, or even reports by staff, which they now must
make to their principal? That could be one measure of whether these programs,
costing Ontario $50 million a year, are doing anything.
Then there are coroner’s inquests.
The deaths of those three boys seem
enough to merit one, although besides shining yet another “spotlight” on the
problem, inquest recommendations have no legal teeth.
And the lack of enforcement or
consequences is a common refrain in bullying.
The gay rights group Egale Canada has requested an inquest in the wake of Jamie Hubley’s death (which the coroner is examining), to look at
youth suicide generally and gay youth suicides particularly.
It might be a start. But the
circumstances behind the deaths of those three young names suggest there’s even
more to examine than that.